Register/ Login   
Submit Mobile RSS Java Script Feed  
Home Blogs Spotlight Videos Movies Cartoon Photos Submit Media Space  Feed Directory 



Profile :

Student DMK leader who was one among the leaders of Anti-Hindi agitation of 1965 , later announced the inception of Anna DMK on October 18 th 1972.Left Anna DMK within 3 months joined DMK back and fought emergency.Went into self imposed political exile in 1978.Lauched Dravida Peravai as political party and registered with Election Commission in 1996.

Content Created :

Blogs Posted :49
Articles Posted:23
Videos Uploaded :2
Albums Uploaded :2

Member Since: 18-10-2007
Previous
    
Next
CONSTRUCTIVE STEPS TO CONSTRUCT TAMIL HISTORY
Published on October 31st, 2007 In Blogging, Writing-Poetry |  Views 842

CONSTRUCTIVE STEP TO

CONSTRUCT HISTORY OF TAMILS  

N.Nandhivarman General Secretary Dravida Peravai

Dravida Peravai, a political party which wants to set an example what a political party of Tamils ought to do had decided to launch a website for publishing all information about Tamil history in one resource bank which will encompass the history of Tamil spread across continents inclusive of Tamil Eelam. Though we will be coordinating this effort we appeal to scholars all over the world to come forward with research based articles to establish our past to evaluate our present and to set the agenda for future.

The necessity to launch a history website arose when I read the book “ Kadaikazhaga Noolhalin Kaalamum Karuthum {Period and Message of Sangam Literature 500 B.C to 500 A.D] written by Dr.R.Mathivanan Former Director of Tamil Etymological Dictionary Project of Government of Tamilnadu. In the preface to the book the learned scholar says, “Japanese have preserved their past history spanning to 2440 years, whereas Egyptians and Sumerians recall with pride their 4000 years of history. The 3000-year-old history of Chinese gives them a unique place. But Tamils with 10000 year of history have not brought it to the world arena.

In Chicago Museum a portrait depicting a Tamil climbing a Palmyra tree mentioning him as Tamil came to the notice of Aringnar Anna that was taken up with the authorities. Instead of many cultural achievements of Tamils this portrait showed Tamil in derogative manner, and on protest the portrait was not removed but the word Tamil in the portrait was deleted. Lamenting about lack of a Museum to depict Tamil Culture, the scholar says that he had relied upon the travelogues of foreigners, literary evidences thrown to light in other languages, recent archaeological findings and the findings of historians who have so far dealt with the History of Tamils. His book would be a compilation of all these evidences in a nutshell, he claims. In Rasatarangini the author Kallanar had brought to light the History of Kashmir from 1800 B.C to 1200 A.D. Like this literary evidence which helped to construct the History of Kashmir, in Tamil the book Nankudi Velir Varalaru comprising 1035 poems and written by Arumuga Nayinar Pillai, which was published in 1920 throws light on the Tamil history, the learned author claims. This book speaks about the family hierarchy of Irungovel, a branch of the Pandyan rulers for 201 generations. This book follows the Kali calendar and narrates the history from 3100 B.C to 1944, hence helps in fixing the date of various rulers and their rule, the author says.

The chart given by Dr.R.Mathivanan to reconstruct Pandyan dynasty.

Pandyan Palsalai Muthukudumi Peruvazhuthi[ 66th  generation]500-450 B.C

  1. Karungai Ollvat Perum Peyar vazhuthi[67th generation]450 B.C to 400 B.C
  2. Porval Vazhuthi[68th  generation]400 B.C to 380.B.C
  3. Korkai Vazhuthi-Nartrer Vazhuthi[69th  generation]380B.C-340 B.C
  4. Deva Pandian[70th generation] 340 B.C-302 B.C
  5. Seya Punjan aliasKadalul maintha Ilamperuvazhuthi[71st]302B.C-270.B.C
  6. Pasum Poon Pandyan[72nd generation]270.B.C –245.B.C
  7. Ollaiyur thantha Boothapandian[73rd generation]245 B.C-220 B.C
  8. Pandyan Nanmaran[74th generation]220 B.C-200 B.C
  9. Nedunchezhian alias Kadalan vazhithi[75th generation]200B.C-180 B.C
  10. Marungai Vazhuthi[76th generation] 180 B.C-160 B.C
  11. Pandyan Uthaman alias Puliman vazhuthi[77th ]160B.C-150 B.C
  12. Pandyan Keeran Sathan[78th generation]150 B.C-140 B.C
  13. Kaliman Vazhuthi alias Andar magan Kuruvazhuthi[79th ]140-120 B.C
  14. Pandyan Yenathi @Nedunkannan [80th ]120 B.C-100 B.C
  15. Korkai Vazhuthi@ Irandam Pasum Poon Pandyan[81st ]100-87 B.C
  16. Deva Pootanan@ Ilavanthikai palli tunjiya Nanmaran[82nd ]87-62 B.C
  17. Thalayanankanathu Cheru Vendra Nedunchezhian[83rd ]62-42 B.C
  18. Kanapereyil kadantha Ukkira Peruvazhuthi[84th ]42 B.C-1 A.D
  19. Pandyan Arivudainambi {Purananooru 184][85th ]A.D 1- 30 A.D
  20. Velliyambalathu tunjiya PeruVazhuthi[86th ]30 A.D-60 A.D
  21. Ariyapadai Kadantha Nedunchezhian [87th ]60 A.D-117 A.D
  22. Vetriver Chezhian [88th generation] 117 A.D-160 A.D.
  23. Nedunchezhian II [89th generation]160 A.D –198 A.D
  24. Ukkira Maran@ Chitramadathu tunjiya Nanmaran[90th ]198 A.D-220 A.D
  25. Pannadu thantha Maran Vazhuthi[91st ] 220A.D-250 A.D
  26. Koddakarathu tunjiya Maranvazhuthi[92nd ]250 A.D-270 A.D
  27. Thennavan Ko [93rd generation] 270 A.D-297 A.D
  28. Parakirama Bahu @ Nalvazhuthi[ 94th generation 298A.D -310 A.D
  29. Kaliyan Koothan [ 95th generation]……………………………….
  30. Kadalan Vazhuthi [ of Kazhugumalai inscriptions] [96th generation
  31. Porkai Pandyan [98th generation]…………………………………..
  32. Pandyan Kadunkhon [103rd generation] 475 A.D-490 A.D
  33. Ukkira Pandyan [103rd generation]  —–498 A.D
  34. Somasundara Pandyan [105th generation] 498 A.D-540 A.D.

  113 year Pact between Three Tamil Emperors 

The Nandhas who ruled North India had fraternal relationship with Three Tamil Emperors but the Mauryas who followed them invaded South India. Imayavaramban Neduncheralathan marched up to Himalayas and inscribed his country symbol, which could not assimilated by the Mauryas who came to Chera country as act of revenge. But the Mauryan armies did not sneak into Chozha territory. This invasion brought home the need to remain united, the call given even now by Kalaignar M.Karunanithi but with no useful purpose to alter ground reality on Tamil disunity. The unity urge united the Three Tamil Emperors who met to sign a Pact of Cooperation in the year 313 B.C, the author Dr.Mathivanan says. Imayavaramban Neduncheralathan, Karungai Olvat Perumvazhuthi and Deva Pandian [ 70th] jointly signed the declaration of unity that lasted for 113 years. This Treaty of Tamil Unity stood as a rock protecting Tamil lands from Northern invaders.

In the final years of the unity era during 200 B.C, in the Chozha Emperor Karikalan II’s court Poetess Mudathamakanniyar who wrote Porunaratrupadai witnessed the rare scene of Three Tamil Emperors sharing same dais which she records in her Porunaratrupadai [53-55]. Poet Kumattor Kannanar who wrote the second ten in Pathitru Pathu also records the historical meeting of Three Tamil Emperors for which he stands as eyewitness. Later in 42 B.C, Poetess Avvaiyar also had the luck to see Three Tamil Emperors together in a rare scene of Unity among Tamils. That unity did not last nor the lessons of unity learnt till date by Tamils.

 THE CHERA EMPERORS: 1.Vanavan @ Vanavaramban  [430-350 B.C]2.Kuttuvan Uthiyan Cheralathan [350-328 B.C] ruled for 22 years3. Imayavaramban Neduncheralathan [328-270 B.C] ruled for 58 years4. Palyaanai Chelkezhu Kuttuvan [270-245 B.C] ruled for 25 years5. Kalangaikanni narmudicheral [245-220 B.C] ruled for 25 years6.Perumcheralathan [220-200 B.C] ruled for 20 years7. Kudakko Neduncheralathan [200-180 B.C] ruled for 20 years8. Kadal Pirakottiya Velkezhu kuttuvan [180-125 B.C] ruled 55 years9. Adukotpattuch Cheralathan [125-87 B.C] ruled 38 years10.Selvak kadungo Vazhiyathan [87-62 B.C] ruled 25 years11.Yanaikatchei Mantharanj Cheral Irumborai [62-42 B.C] ruled 20 years12. Thagadoor Erintha Perum Cheral Irumborai [42-25 B.C] ruled 17 years13. Ilancheral Irumborai [25-19 B.C] ruled 16 years14. Karuvur Eriya Koperumcheral Irumborai [9-1 B.C]15. Vanji Mutrathu tunjiya Anthuvancheral [B.C 20 – 10 A.D]16. Kanaikal Irumborai [20-30 A.D]17. Palai Padiya Perum kadungko [1-30 A.D]18. Kokothai Marban [[30 –60 A.D]19.Cheran Chenguttuvan [60-140 A.D]20.Kottambalathu tunjiya Maakothai [140-150 A.D]21.Cheraman mudangi kidantha Nedumcheralathan [150-160 A.D]22.Cheraman Kanaikkal Irumborai [160-180 A.D]23. Cheraman Ilamkuttuvan [180-200 A.D]24.Thambi Kuttuvan [200-220 A.D]25.Poorikko [220-250 A.D]26. Cheraman Kuttuvan Kothai [250-270 A.D]27.Cheraman Vanjan [270-300 A.D]28. Mantharanj Cheral [330-380 A.D] found in Allahabad inscriptions of Samudragupta.  RECONSTRUCTION OF CHOZHA RULE 1.Karikalan I [450-380 B.C]2. Cheraman Paamaloor erintha Neythalanganal Ilamchetchenni [380-320 B.C]3.Cherupaazhi erintha Ilamchetchenni [320-270 B.C]4. Perumpoon chenni [270-245 B.C]5.Uruva Paikhrer Ilamchetchenni [245-232 B.C]6. Karikalan II [232-200 B.C]7. Manakkilli [200-180 B.C]8. Vel pahradakkai Peruviral Killi [180-160 B.C]9.Pooravaikopp Perunarkkilli [160-125 B.C]10. Mudithalai Koperunarkkilli [125-87 B.C]11.Koperum Chozhan [87-62 B.C]12. Otrumai Vetta Perunarkkilli [62-40 B.C]13. Chetchenni Nalankilli @ Maavalathan [40-22 B.C]14.Kulamutrathu tunjiya Killivalavan [B.C22 - 1 A.D]15.Kurapalli tunjiya Perum Thirumavalavan [1-40 A.D]16.Neythalankanal Ilamchetchenni [40-60 A.D]17. Karikalan III [60-110 A.D]18. Maavan Killi [110-130 A.D]19. Nedumudikkilli [130-150 A.D]20.Chenganan [150-180 A.D]21. Isai Ve ngilli 180-210 A.D]22.Kaivankilli [210-240 A.D]23. Polampoonkilli [240-260 A.D]24. Kadumankilli [260-285 A.D]25. Nalladi [285-330 A.D] known by Agananooru 356th  poem26.Chozha Rule in Andhra [300-400 A.D] 

Dr.Mathivanan had undertaken a thankless job. We would urge Tamils all over the world to buy the book “ Kadaikkazha Noolhalin Kaalamum Karuthum published by Thilagam Pathipagam 17 E, B-1, 12. K.K.Ponnurangam Salai, Omsakthinagar, Valasaravakkam, Chennai 600087 Tel:044-24861007 or contact the author at: rmvanan@gmail.com Cell: 9283217788.

Basing the Tamil epic Perumkathai, a historical note is hidden in the poem414 of Narkudi Vellalar Varalaru. It says in B.C 701 a Tamil King Udayanan defeated the Aryans and ruled North India. If he had continued to rule or if he had not succumbed to the submissive Aryan pretenders, The Gupta rule could not have come up, the appendix of the book states. Well our scholars will fight like street dogs for centuries instead of fixing the period of Tamil epics or Tamil Kings. It is within the genes of Tamils not to accept another Tamil as scholar. If a white skinned scholar tells all will fall in line. This mentality must go. Nothing wrong in debating but not debating beyond centuries. Tamil unity. Let us join hands to reconstruct Tamil history.

       

  Share      Print


2 Responses to “CONSTRUCTIVE STEPS TO CONSTRUCT TAMIL HISTORY”
    1. MNachiappan Says:
    Posted on November 1st, 2007

    There have been many mistakes in the write-up and I shall point out some of them:

    1.In Rasatarangini the author Kallanar had brought to light the History of Kashmir from 1800 B.C to 1200 A.D. Like this literary evidence which helped to construct the History of Kashmir -

    The name of the work should be “Rajatarangini” and the name of the author, “Kalhana” and not as he mentioned.

    1a. This book follows the Kali calendar and narrates the history from 3100 B.C to 1944, hence helps in fixing the date of various rulers and their rule, the author says.

    This is the double-game of Nandi and other dravidian protagonists. They rely upon Sanskrit literature, but pour venow on Sanskrit. Indians cannot get anything from this type of malicious, hate-mongering and fanatic ideologists.

    2.Pandyan Palsalai Muthukudumi Peruvazhuthi[ 66th generation]500-450 B.C………

    The basis for fixing the dates. What happened to the earlier 65 dynasties?

    3. For the Tamil kings marching to Himalayas and planting their royal insignia, evidences have to be produced. K. N. Sivaraja Pillai (Chronology of the Ancient Tamils) has refuted such claims as myth.

    One has to prove the existence of Sangam, whethere there was one or were three is another story!

    4. It says in B.C 701 a Tamil King Udayanan defeated the Aryans and ruled North India. ………..again proof required. Ironically, Sangam poets have mentioned the word “Aiyar” seven times, but they never called them “Dravidians”. The “Aryan-Dravidian” interpretation of history would not give any result, when such hypotheses and theories have already proven as myth and unhistorical.

    5. As Nandi claims, Madhivanan has not found out anything new, as there have been many books touching upon the subject. He only borrowed from such secondary sources and ironically even without acknowledging such sources. I can give list of all books.

    It is not correct for any researcher for not mentioning the sources, that too, when, one has evidently borrowed and relied upon such chronology and methodology.

    6. More irony is that calling his group as a “political party” to indulge in such activities. His name and style and of the party clearly prove that he has been racist, racialist and linguistic fanatic.

    7. Still, if he feels, he can come to forums like IHC and present his wonderful ideas as paper for the evaluation and acceptance of historians.

    8. The Marxist-JNU historians have raised many questions about the ancient Tamil history, which should be answered. They assert that there was no state formation in Tamizhagam till first centuries of current era and therefore, the Sangam people must have been nomadic barbarians and so on.

    Ironically, the historians who come here - Chempakalakshmi, T. K. Venkataubramanian, M. G. S. Narayanan etc., speak one thing here and lecture exactly opposite in their ideological forums.

    So also Askp Parpola and others.

    9. Incidentally, Steve Farmer has mentioned Madivanan as a forgerer of IVC scripts in India for his interpretation. He has also anounced some $ 10,000 for anybody who has cracked the code!

    10. As Madhivanan claims, he can claim the amount. Perhaps, Nandi can help him!

      Share    Print

    2. neversayno32 Says:
    Posted on November 5th, 2007

    Nachiappan sir,

    Amazing and fitting reply. My knowledge of the history is just that I learnt toll my SSC, but with your detailed explanation, I am sure Nandivarman would reply too, unfortunately this blog would die a natural death or would be killed by the answer-less Nandhivarmanji.

    JNU/MARXISTS are nothing but a bunch of intellectually bankrupt oldies, getting paid to write only as told by their MASTERS. Who else you know better………..

      Share    Print



    You must be logged in to post comments

Recent Posts





     

Rayilu...

Muthirai ...

Achchamundu Achcha...


Saravedi...

Paiya...

Rettaichuli...

Sasirekha Paranaya ...

Trump Card on Loca ...

Ilayaraja Composin ...


Rayilu Crew Meet ...

Asha Bhosale Inagu ...

Mahanagaram Lo Shi ...
     


About | Content providers | Support | Beta feedback | Report abuse | Contact us | Careers | FAQ